China's high-end intelligence remodeling global industrial geo-structure

The rise of China-made is a very abstract concept, the most intuitive feeling is that we supply the world's Chinese-made products. In 2011, China's industrial output surpassed that of the United States and became the world's largest industrialized country. Prior to this, the industrial output value of the United States took the first place in the world for more than a century.

Now, while China's industry continues to maintain a relatively high growth rate, industrial output in the three traditional developed economies of Europe, Japan and the United States has shown sluggish growth. Most of us are using figures to perceive the rise of Chinese manufacturing. However, the figures are only the result. The path to China's rise is even more important. We took full advantage of the opportunities for the two industries to move eastward after World War II and rapidly built the most complete Industrial sectors, large-scale education and innovation knowledge supply system, comprehensive low-cost factor advantages and higher productivity.

Today, some industry insiders still place the concept of Chinese manufacturing in the world's factories. This view is somewhat general or even wrong because the rise of China's industry is not the result of the transfer of manufacturing links in the developed countries in the world. Many public opinions judge that the re-industrialization of different developed countries leads to the return of production links, which will result in the shrinking of the scale of China's manufacturing. From the beginning of the global financial crisis in 2008 to the present, this situation did not arise, but the strong demand for restraint and regulatory power, high-density industrial clusters and industrial chains and the increasing scale of technology transfer have become the support industries Long-term development of the structural forces, and to China to create a re-cast one of the world's most massive manufacturing base. It should be admitted that the rise of China's manufacturing is a structural change in the global industry, not random at one time.

Of course, we can not rely on the historical causes of the rise of China's manufacturing and support the industrial revolution in the new era. The rapid development of interconnection technology has made it no longer simply perform a narrow range of communications functions, but rather become the most important organizational technology and organizational logic to restructure the global industry.

The re-industrialization of the developed countries can not be interpreted lightly as a pullback in the production process or as a return to the so-called low-end industries. Since the rise of China's manufacturing, the global industry is experiencing the largest migration. Among them, we have already seen the physical relocation of industrial facilities, but the most important part of this relocation is logical migration, that is, an iteration of the industrial paradigm. The global industry is in the midst of a wave of mass-to-mass customization that is reshaping the geopolitical fabric of global industry.

The rise of China's high-end smart-manufacturing has an omnidirectional impact on the global industrial pattern. In fact, the high-end intellectual property in China and the traditional strong industries such as the United States, Europe and Japan have some of the same industries and products, which aggravate the competition in this field. However, the most important role played by China in high-end intelligence development is not to create cost pressure on industries in advanced economies but to find gaps in the knowledge supply system of advanced economies. The innovation system in China has begun to extend its reach in developed countries in the world. Caused the differentiation of knowledge supply system in developed economies.

The diversion of innovation capability in developed economies to China, the cost advantage of factors of production and the education and innovation system of China itself are intertwined, resulting in the upward migration of Chinese manufacturing in different industrial chains. The pressure on developed economies is enormous . The use of interconnection technology can not fully open the door to knowledge supply in developed economies toward China, but it has reshaped the door to making global demand open to China. This is the reason why China has made it possible to balance the industrial pressures in the developed economies Mechanical fulcrum.

This fulcrum is theoretically clear, but it is hard to be analyzed in industrial realities. So, how to make industry get such a huge demand is a global industrial problem.

The era of communication equal to human-to-human communication has in fact ended. In the era of the Internet of Things, any object can theoretically become the main body of communication. Therefore, the contradiction between innovation and industry has clearly emerged. How to deal with large-scale social innovation has become a problem for industry. This dilemma has so far not been taken seriously, and so we see that Germany and the United States proudly plan to repackage their industries with robots, and that such industrial projects have also been crowned with intergenerational titles.

The high-end intelligence-based manufacturing in the traditional industrial sense is still highly competitive. It will continue its position as a load-bearing structure in the entire country-specific industrial structure. However, the real competitiveness of the industrial future is not here. We can see that even though China's high-end intelligence has risen, the U.S. industry still holds the leading role of global technology. However, we can not attribute the leading and simple one-century lead of U.S. industry to the benefits brought by the two world wars. Obviously, an industrial reform movement without the domination of advanced industrial logic will all be a fancy performance for which no one pays.

Industry does not have to be amended, nor does it have to be rebuilt, but must be subverted. In the future, industry must be deployed as part of a community into an open, innovative, and ever-present social fabric. In other words, tomorrow's industry must be an open social system, not a closed system like the industrial industry in history. The author is content with the achievements made in China, and the success of the stage can easily bring a sense of repose to rest. The historical success of China's rise is more due to the economy of elements and our diligence, but the success of the next phase depends on reversing the wisdom of logic.

In order to rapidly push forward the transformation of their industrial systems, Germany, the United States and China all have their own benchmarking transformation companies: Siemens, General Motors and Haier. Those enterprises that are trying to transform have become the transformational logic laboratories of the state industry. Of course, the test of China's Haier is more advanced and more advanced in terms of process. This is most gratifying. We are filled with anticipation of the surging time between Haier's pre-industrial mode of operation and the huge scale of China's industry.